You can make a big impact in the Rose Haven community by participating in BottleDrop’s campaign where your cans and bottles can help us raise essential funds. 

You can contribute Blue Bags for Rose Haven year-round!

These vital funds enable us to serve more than 4,000 guests annually with safety, supplies, and support. 

 

The process is simple:

 

Step 1:

Pick up your special bags with Rose Haven’s special QR code at Rose Haven or a BottleDrop location.

Step 2:

Fill them up! Plastic, aluminum, and glass can all go in the same bag. No need to sort!

Step 3:

Drop full bags at a BottleDrop location. Scan the bag tag to open the secure Drop Door. Up to 15 Blue Bags can be dropped per nonprofit each day without an appointment. With advance notice, you can schedule an appointment to drop off up to 50 bags at a BottleDrop Redemption Center.

 

There are a lot of false narratives about poverty…

In recent conversations with our guests, they shared that they want you to have accurate information about homelessness. Before you read on, Take our quiz to test your knowledge on homelessness!

 

_______________________________________________________________________

 

True or False: Oregon has the highest rate of unsheltered school children in the U.S.

Answer: True, Oregon has the highest rate of unsheltered school age children in the country. And, the vast majority of homeless children in Multnomah county are living unsheltered.

Of the more than seven hundred homeless children in Multnomah county in 2023, 87% were living unsheltered (outside of emergency shelter or transitional housing). Children that experience homelessness are more likely to experience bullying, have lower performance in school, and are more at risk of developing mental and physical health conditions. 

 

What percentage of homeless people in Multnomah County have a minority gender identity (female, transgender, no single gender identity, or questioning)?

Answer: In Multnomah county, 34% of people experiencing homelessness identify as being female, transgender, having no single gender identity, or identify as questioning.

However, this number is likely much higher as almost 20% of people surveyed chose not to report their gender identity. Gender minorities experiencing homelessness often face an increased risk of being victims of interpersonal violence related to their gender or sexual orientation. 

For example, 90% of women experiencing homelessness reported severe physical or sexual abuse at some point in their lives. Additionally, 38% of domestic violence victims become homeless at some point. For LQBTQIA2s+ individuals, 28% will experience homelessness at some point in their lives. 

What are the main causes of homelessness?

Answer: The main cause of homelessness is a lack of safe, accessible housing, often stemming from systemic oppression.

In Oregon, like the rest of the U.S., we have a lack of affordable housing and a need for more housing assistance programs. Additionally, employment opportunities that pay a livable wage are declining. Even when people do find work, they may continue to live in poverty. While domestic violence, addiction, and mental health conditions contribute to people’s challenges and experiences with homelessness, they are not the main causes. 

It is not inevitable that those who experience violence, use drugs, or struggle with a mental health condition will become homeless. Homelessness occurs when safe, accessible, affordable housing is unavailable to people, especially those who are at a higher risk due to mental and physical conditions or life experiences. 

 

There are 2,485 beds available for unsheltered people in Multnomah County. What percentage of the city’s homeless population do you think this accommodates?

Answer: Currently, shelter beds accommodate less than 17% of homeless people in Multnomah County.

The Joint Office of Homeless Services (JOHS) reported having 2,485 shelter beds in Multnomah County as of March, 2025. In the Portland area in March of 2025, there were 15,245 people living homeless. This indicates a need in our community for more low barrier emergency shelter beds and transitional housing opportunities.

The term “serious mental illness” encapsulates conditions such as schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and other conditions that have severe impacts on daily functioning. What percentage of people who are homeless do you think have a serious mental illness in Multnomah county?

Answer: Just under a fourth of people who are homeless have a serious mental illness in Multnomah county.

In 2023, only 23.5% of people experiencing unsheltered homelessness in Multnomah County had a serious mental illness. The national average is 16%. While the need for more mental health related resources for those struggling with serious mental illness in Multnomah County should not be understated, it is important to understand that the majority of people living homeless are not experiencing severe mental health conditions. 

 

What percentage of people who are homeless experience any kind of mental health condition including a substance use disorder? 

Answer: More than 75% of people experiencing homelessness have some kind of mental health condition including a substance use disorder.

While the number of people experiencing homelessness who have a mental health condition that greatly impairs daily functioning in Multnomah county is low, the majority do experience mental health concerns.

Unfortunately, homelessness is an inherently traumatizing experience that can lead to worsened or newly developed mental health conditions. Focusing on getting people housed is the best way to prevent or reduce the impact of serious mental health conditions for people experiencing homelessness.

 

What percentage of people who are homeless do you think have a substance use disorder in Multnomah county?

Answer: About a fourth of people who are experiencing unsheltered homelessness have a substance use disorder in Multnomah county.

In 2023, only 26.8% of people experiencing unsheltered homelessness in Multnomah County had a substance use disorder. Media often over-reports on mental illness and addiction in the homeless population, leading to a misunderstanding that most homeless people use drugs in a way that creates problems in their lives. This is untrue.

Compared to the homeless population in Multnomah county, in 2023 about 17% of the general population in the United States experienced a substance use disorder. Addictive behaviors are often the result of traumatic experiences. Higher rates of substance use disorders in the homeless population are likely a reaction to trauma experienced during homelessness. 

True or False: People who are homeless are more likely to commit violent crimes.

Answer: People experiencing homelessness are more likely to be victims than perpetrators of violent crime.

Despite media sensationalism of violent crime and homelessness, people who are homeless are more likely to be victims than perpetrators of violent crime. People experiencing homelessness may be more likely to commit nonviolent crimes such as camping or trespassing and are more likely to be targeted for drug related activities despite using drugs at similar rates to those in the housed population. These are all crimes that are in some way associated with their homelessness. 

 

True or False: Camping sweeps increase people’s motivation to seek housing, employment, or mental health related resources.

Answer: Camping sweeps create cycles of hardship for people experiencing homelessness.

Recently, campsite removals have increased in an attempt to clear homeless people from sidewalks and other areas. Some people have argued that campsite removals encourage people to access resources to get off the street. However, we know that campsite removals cause tremendous harm to people experiencing homelessness and negatively impact their ability to access services, especially for people who experience mental health conditions or use drugs.

 

What do you think are the best solutions to resolve homelessness in Portland (check all that apply)?

Answer: There are many ways to reduce the negative impacts of homelessness but to get to the root causes, it is essential to increase access to safe, accessible, and affordable housing. Additionally, employment opportunities must also be made more accessible and inclusive, and be made to pay a livable wage. 

In addition to addressing root causes, funding resource centers like Rose Haven can help provide connection to necessary resources for people living in poverty. Some of those resources include non coercive and non judgmental mental health and addiction treatment for those who are interested in it. Jailing people for living in poverty, or forcing them into treatment only exacerbates poor outcomes. 

How much do you agree with the following statement: My perceptions of people experiencing homelessness have an effect on their health and wellbeing.

Answer: Community knowledge and perceptions of people experiencing homelessness have an effect on their health and wellbeing.

What we know about homelessness, mental health, and addiction greatly impact not only our day to day interactions with people experiencing these hardships but also our voting practices, policies, and community norms surrounding treatment of our neighbors. Misinformation can worsen stigma and have far reaching impacts on the wellbeing of our community. We all have the power to make change through sharing information about the realities of homelessness in Portland. 

 

Citations

Commission on Domestic and Sexual Violence. (n.d.). Five Facts About Domestic & Sexual Violence and Homelessness. American Bar Association. https://www.americanbar.org/groups/domestic_violence/Initiatives/five-for-five/five-facts-homelessness/#:~:text=In%20addition%2C%20more%20than%2090,housing%20and%20maintaining%20safe%20housing.

Goldshear, J. L., Kitonga, N., Angelo, N., Cowan, A., Henwood, B. F., & Bluthenthal, R. N. (2023). “Notice of major cleaning”: A qualitative study of the negative impact of encampment sweeps on the ontological security of unhoused people who use drugs. Social Science & Medicine (1982), 339, Article 116408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116408

Gultekin, L.E., Brush, B.L., Ginier, E., Cordom, A., Dowdell, E.B. (2021) Health risks and outcomes of homelessness in school-age children and youth: A scoping review of the literature. The Journal of School Nursing, 36(1), 10-18. doi:10.1177/1059840519875182

Gutwinski, S., Schreiter, S., Deutscher, K., & Fazel, S. (2021). The prevalence of mental disorders among homeless people in high-income countries: An updated systematic review and meta-regression analysis. PLoS Medicine18(8), e1003750. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003750

Homelessness Research and Action Collaborative. (2024, April 29). 2023 Point in Time Findings Report. https://hsd.multco.us/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/FINAL-PITC-2023-Findings-Report-April-2024.pdf 

Homeless Services Department. (n.d.). Data Dashboard. Multnomah County. https://hsd.multco.us/data-dashboard/

Konkolÿ Thege, B., Horwood, L., Slater, L. et al. (2027). Relationship between interpersonal trauma exposure and addictive behaviors: a systematic review. BMC Psychiatry 17, 164 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-017-1323-1

National Alliance to End Homelessness. (2022, January 24). The Disturbing Realities of Homelessness and Violence. https://endhomelessness.org/blog/the-disturbing-realities-of-homelessness-and-violence/

National Coalition for the Homeless. (n.d.). Domestic Violence and Homelessness. https://nationalhomeless.org/domestic-violence/

National Coalition for the Homeless. (n.d.). Employment & Income. https://nationalhomeless.org/employment-income/

National Coalition for the Homeless. (n.d.). Homelessness in the US. https://nationalhomeless.org/homelessness-in-the-us/

Talbot, R., Fields, A., Santa Cruz, N., Miller, M., Mukulu, Z., Rota, M. (2024, October 29). Swept Away. ProPublica. https://www.propublica.org/series/swept-away

SAMHSA. (July, 2024). Key Substance Use and Mental Health Indicators in the United States: Results from the 2023 National Survey on Drug Use and Health. https://www.samhsa.gov/data/sites/default/files/reports/rpt47095/National%20Report/National%20Report/2023-nsduh-annual-national.pdf

Trevor Project. (2021, November 23). Homelessness and Housing Instability Among LGBTQ Youth. https://www.thetrevorproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/Trevor-Project-Homelessness-Report.pdf

Rose Haven opened its doors in 1997 with the goal to help the gender centered issues for women. It was a place  free from the gender-based violence and abuse that disproportionately targets people experiencing homelessness and poverty.  Rose Haven continues to be a day shelter serving those most harmed by sexism and gender-based violence. However our understanding of what that means has changed. 

Today our doors are open to beyond cis women as we understand that trans, non-binary, and gender fluid folks are actually the most likely to be harmed by gender-based violence

According to data, LGBTQIA+ individuals are 120% more likely to experience homelessness than their cisgender, heterosexual peers. In 2021, the poverty rate among LGBTQIA+ individuals stood at 17%, compared to 12% among non-LGBTQIA+ individuals, even though LGBTQIA+ individuals comprise only  5.5% of the U.S. population.

 

Systemic discrimination against LGBTQ+ people starts at a young age and has lasting economic dis-advancements.  Such experiences can result in academic disengagement, limited access to higher education, and long-term economic insecurity. Within school 62.6% of transgender and gender-expansive youth—have been “teased, bullied, or treated badly.”

Within the work place 40% of LGBTQ+ workers have withheld their identity at their job due to fear of being stigmatized or facing violence at work. Discrimination can take forms in many different stages from the initial interview all the way to senior level promotions.

Percentage of LGBTQ+ youth victimized at school due to SO/GI/GE in the prior year (Human Rights Campaign)

Beyond work discrimination there are housing limitations for members in the community.  A 2019 study found that same-sex couple applicants were 73% more likely to be denied a mortgage than similarly situated opposite-sex couples and that same-sex couples who were approved for a mortgage were charged higher average interest rates compared with opposite-sex couples. Overall, 28% of LGBTQ youth reported experiencing homelessness or housing instability at some point in their lives, 16% of LGBTQ youth reported that they had slept away from parents or caregivers because they ran away from home, with more than half (55%) reporting that they ran away from home because of mistreatment or fear of mistreatment due to their LGBTQ identity. And 14% of LGBTQ youth reported that they had slept away from parents or caregivers because they were kicked out or abandoned, with 40% reporting that they were kicked out or abandoned due to their LGBTQ identity.

 

Past and Current Housing Instability for LGBTQ Gender Identity (Trevor Project)

Systemic discrimination makes LGBTQ+ individuals more likely to experience poverty and more likely to encounter certain barriers to accessing public benefits, such lack of access to individuals remain trapped in a cycle of poverty and may suffer from short- and long-term health effects. 

In 2020, the Center for American Progress published the results of a survey in which 66% of transgender LGBTQ respondents and 23% of cisgender LGBTQ respondents reported some degree of difficulty obtaining accurate identification documents due to discrimination. In 2015 Transgender Equality Report captured that “[a]s a result of showing an ID with a name or gender that did not match their gender presentation [in public], 25% of [respondents] were verbally harassed, 16% were denied services or benefits, 9% were asked to leave a location or establishment, and 2% were assaulted or attacked.”

Advocates and allies should push congress to pass anti-discrimination legislation on a federal level. Additionally move towards repeal or amend existing federal legislation that reinforces the cycle of poverty in the LGBTQ+ community. 

The pride celebrations that happen globally throughout June and July  are an affirmation of identity, and a celebration of a community – with international calls for equality, inclusions and justice. Join us at the Pride Northwest Festival July 19th and 20th in Portland!

One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA), is in a very critical stage right now as the Trump administration hopes to pass through both chambers of Congress by July 4, 2025.

But the path is far from smooth. On May 22, the House narrowly approved the bill by just one vote (215–214). Since then, opposition has been growing.

Recently, the Senate Committee on Finance released its draft version, removing a controversial tax on large philanthropic foundations that would have reduced nonprofit funding. While nonprofits may welcome this change, the rest of the bill still delivers big tax cuts for the wealthy contrasted by deep cuts for the vulnerable.

What Does This Mean for Families?
According to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), the House version, and the current Senate version  would slash Medicaid spending by about $800 billion over the next decade. The Commonwealth Fund warns that 1 in 5 children could lose Medicaid coverage. The bill would also allow states to impose stricter work requirements on Medicaid recipients as young as 19.

(Source VOX https://www.vox.com/trump-administration/415825/trump-big-beautiful-bill-congress-deficit-tax-cuts)

In Oregon, Medicaid enrollment could drop by 19%, the second highest decline in the country, tied with Kentucky and just behind Virginia at 21%. Despite these projections, House Speaker Mike Johnson continues to deny that the bill cuts Medicaid.

SNAP (Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program) is also at risk, with more than $290 million in proposed cuts. This could jeopardize food security for over 15 million children nationwide. This would also leave kids vulnerable to also lose access to free and reduced lunch, a program that 49% of Oregon students grades k-12 qualify for. 

Ironically, even with these cuts, the bill would increase the federal deficit by $2.77 trillion over the next ten years, because the tax breaks mostly benefit America’s wealthiest. Such extreme  debt like this can lead to higher interest rates, reduced funding for public services, and future tax hikes.

Impacts on Generational Poverty

If passed, the OBBBA would not only cause immediate harm but also deepen generational poverty for years to come. Generational poverty happens when families remain trapped in poverty for two or more generations. This mainly stems because they lack stable jobs, education, housing, or health care. Without Medicaid and SNAP, children are more likely to grow up in households that struggle to afford doctor visits, nutritious food, or a safe place to live. These early disadvantages make it harder for kids to integrate in society, perform well academically, stay physically and mentally healthy, all things that contribute  to having a stable adult life. Cutting these essential supports now will make it even harder for struggling families to break free from this cycle, locking entire communities into long-term hardship and inequality. While the OBBA doesn’t have an expiration date, it does determine the budget for at least 10 years in the future. 

What Happens Next?

(Source Fox Business https://www.foxbusiness.com/economy/deficits-from-big-beautiful-bill-rise-nearly-2-8t-under-new-dynamic-estimate-cbo)

The bill must pass the Senate and then return to the House for final approval before it reaches the President’s desk. With two GOP Senators, Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) and Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.), already opposed due to its fiscal implication, just one more dissenting vote could stop it.

Rose Haven Urges Congress to Reject the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA).

If passed, this bill would slash funding for Medicaid and SNAP, stripping away essential health care and food support from millions. For people already on the edge, losing these lifelines means a higher risk of falling into poverty and homelessness.

Cuts like these don’t just strain families, they overwhelm already overworked local shelters and leave entire communities struggling to keep people housed and safe. Protecting access to food and health care is key to preventing homelessness.

We urge you to take action: use the link provided here to contact your legislators and send the letter below to tell them to vote NO on the OBBBA. Together, we can stand up for our most vulnerable neighbors.

—————————————————————————————————————————————————–[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, State, ZIP Code]
[Email Address]
[Date]

The Honorable [Representative’s/Senator’s Name]
[Office Address]
[City, State, ZIP Code]

Dear [Representative/Senator] [Last Name],

I hope this message finds you well. I’m writing to you not just as your constituent but as someone who cares deeply about the well-being of my neighbors and our community’s future.

I’m urging you to please vote NO on the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA). This bill may promise tax cuts, but the reality is it would take away vital lifelines like Medicaid and SNAP from millions of families who depend on them. Without these programs, many parents would struggle to keep their kids healthy and fed, and more people could end up losing their homes altogether.

, Despite all these painful cuts, this bill would actually add $2.77 trillion to our national debt over the next decade. That means higher borrowing costs and  fewer resources for things like schools and roads. 

Please stand up for families, for fiscal responsibility, and for a healthier, more stable community by voting NO on the OBBBA. Your leadership and compassion matter so much right now.

Thank you for  representing us.

Sincerely,
[Your Name]

In May 2024, the Supreme Court sided with the City of Grants Pass in Grants Pass v. Johnson, a case centered on the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment as it applies to people experiencing homelessness, opening the door for the criminalization of poverty around the country. Currently, Oregon has the eighth-highest number of unhoused people in the United States. In Grants Pass alone, point-in-time estimates show that about 600 out of 40,000 residents are unhoused. Despite this, the city has no public homeless shelters and relies heavily on one single small, privately run, faith-based shelter. That one shelter also has high barriers members need to meet to be able to receive services such as attending mandatory weekly religious meetings rooted in the Christian faith despite their own religious belief or lack thereof. The plaintiffs were forcibly evicted onto the streets, leading to a  forcible removal and placement into jails. Ed Johnson, the lead counsel for the plaintiffs, argued that it  is  cruel and unusual punishment to jail them for simply existing. The National Supreme Court disagreed

 

(Photo by Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)

The History: 

The roots and implications of this case extend far beyond Grants Pass or even Oregon. Grants Pass v. Johnson builds on two landmark cases: California v. Robinson (1962) and Martin v. Boise (2018). Since the Supreme Court’s decision,  roughly 150 cities in 32 states have passed or strengthened such anti-poverty ordinances.

In California v. Robinson, the Supreme Court ruled it unconstitutional to criminalize a person solely for their “status” of drug addiction. While one could be prosecuted for illegal drug use, simply being an addict could not be punished. Decades later, the Ninth Circuit’s ruling in Martin v. Boise held that the Eighth Amendment prohibits cities from imposing criminal penalties on unhoused individuals for sitting, sleeping, or lying in public if no alternative shelter is available.

How Does this Precedent Relate to Grants Pass?


Originally filed in 2018,  Johnson v. Grants Pass found that citing or arresting people who have nowhere else to sleep constitutes cruel and unusual punishment. The city’s practice of ticketing people for sleeping outdoors, despite the lack of available shelter, was deemed unconstitutional at the time. The current Supreme Court ruling reverses that decision, holding that ticketing or arresting unhoused people under these circumstances does not violate the Eighth Amendment.  Johnson v. Grants Pass was the first time in nearly 40 years that the Supreme Court had to weigh in directly on the criminalization of poverty.

Does This Solve the Homelessness Crisis?


In short, no!

This ruling does not address the root causes of homelessness and will likely worsen the problem. By allowing cities to penalize people for sleeping outside when they have no alternatives, it perpetuates what researchers call the Homelessness-Jail Cycle. This cycle illustrates the  pushing of unhoused individuals into frequent contact with law enforcement, fines, and jail time, which further destabilizes their lives.

Source: Janey Rountree, Nathan Hess, and Austin Lyke, “Health Conditions among Unsheltered Adults in the US,” California Policy Lab, October 6, 2019, https://www.capolicylab.org/health-
conditions-among-unsheltered-adults-in-the-u-s/.
Copyright: Urban Institute https://www.urban.org/features/five-charts-explain-homelessness-jail-cycle-and-how-break-it

According to the California Policy Lab, people experiencing unsheltered homelessness reported an average of 21 police contacts in six months — ten times more than people staying in shelters. They were also nine times more likely to spend at least one night in jail during that period. Frequent interactions with the justice system trap people in a cycle of jails, shelters, emergency rooms, and detox centers, rather than connecting them with stable housing, mental health care, or substance use treatment.

This cycle is compounded by the fact that formerly incarcerated people are nearly ten times more likely to become homeless than the general public, and with limited job opportunities, escaping this cycle becomes even harder. As University of Michigan law professor Maria Edmands, JD, notes:

“This ruling has made it easier for cities to take the harshest and, frankly, least sustainable approach to removing the most visible manifestations of our affordable housing crisis. This is not only wrong doctrinally but also, as a policy matter, short-sighted, ineffective, and cruel.”

Current Impact in Portland:


In May 2024, the Portland City Council unanimously passed an ordinance banning camping in public spaces. While the ordinance allows camping if no shelter beds are available, it heavily restricts what people can do while camping and allows penalties if they refuse to move when shelter is offered. Violators face a $100 fine and up to seven days in jail. However, Multnomah County Sheriff Morrissey O’Donnell, elected in 2022 for a four-year-term, has publicly stated that her office will not enforce these penalties, agreeing they worsen rather than solve the crisis.

Source: ACLU https://www.aclu.org/one-year-since-grants-pass-tracking-the-criminalization-of-homelessness

A case that started in Oregon however has national implications, a 2021 study found that 48 out of 50 states have at least one law criminalizing homelessness, and some states have as many as six.

Since the Supreme Court’s decision roughly 150 cities in 32 states have passed or strengthened such anti-poverty ordinances.

Four counties in California have imposed ordinances that place a $1,000 fine and up to six months in jail if found guilty of their camping ban. In Elmara, New York it can be up to one year in jail.

What Should Be Done Instead?


Fines and incarceration will not solve homelessness in Portland or elsewhere. Real solutions require investing in affordable housing, crisis intervention services, and accessible addiction treatment. Rose Haven urges policymakers to prioritize prevention and care rather than further criminalizing poverty and homelessness.

Call To Action: 

No one deserves to be punished for not having a place to sleep. It is crucial to keep an eye out for upcoming laws and regulations regarding anti-poverty and push our law makers to make the ethical choice. As Supreme Court Justice Soniya Sotmoyer stated in her dissenting argument.

“That responsibility is shared by those vulnerable populations, the States and cities in which they reside, and each and every one of us.”

To Learn More Visit: 

https://newrepublic.com/post/183263/sotomayor-dissent-supreme-court-homelessness-ruling-grants-pass

https://homelesslaw.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/2021-HNH-State-Crim-Supplement.pdf

https://www.portland.gov/code/14/a50#toc–14a-50-140-camping-definitions-

https://www.oyez.org/cases/2023/23-175

https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/603/23-175/#tab-opinion-4909853

https://www.orcities.org/resources/communications/local-focus/implications-grants-pass-v-johnson#:~:text=The%20city%20of%20Grants%20Pass,%E2%80%9Cadequate%E2%80%9D%20shelter%20beds%20available.

https://www.aclu-wa.org/story/johnson-v-grants-pass-breakdown-case-supreme-court-and-what-it-could-mean-people-experiencing

https://freopp.org/oppblog/policy-implications-grants-pass/

https://michigan.law.umich.edu/news/5qs-edmonds-discusses-grants-pass-v-johnson-scotus-ruling-and-homelessness-us 

https://www.opb.org/article/2024/05/08/portland-city-council-passes-new-regulations-camping-public-property/

 


About the Author: 

Helia Attar wearing a white button down in a black coat sitting on the waterline of Kuwait City, Kuwait during sunset.

Helia Attar is an international studies student at Boston College whose work centers on political violence, gender, and power in the Middle East. Born in Iran and raised in Portland, where she moved in 2012, she brings a transnational lens to her research and advocacy. She has conducted independent fieldwork sponsored by her university on women’s political representation in Kuwait and has years of experience in grassroots organizing and civil liberties advocacy. During the summer of 2025, she interns at Rose Haven, where she explores the intersection of economics, public policy, and care systems impacting Portland’s most vulnerable. Her writing bridges academic inquiry with lived experience, grounding policy analysis in the realities of those most affected. In her free time she loves to spend time outdoors and explore the Pacific North West.

We were honored to take part in  Rip City Remix’s Celebration Game Series during their G League season! On Saturday, March 22nd, we participated in Women’s Empowerment Night to highlight and uplift women in sports and across our community. Our development director Liz Stark joined Remix president Hannah Grauert on Katu2 ABC to share our mission.             

 

                                View The Clip Here!

thumb of shirt

Purchase a Shirt or Mug from Living Room Realty to Help Us Raise Funds

tshirt view

To celebrate and honor this year’s Fair Housing Month, Living Room Realty has designed these incredible shirts and mugs with all proceeds from sales going to Rose Haven.

Shirts: $25

Mugs: $20

Purchase Products Here

Living Room Realty is a Real Estate Brokerage with offices in Portland, Manzanita, and Vancouver with proven commitment to upholding their values by integrating sustainability into their work environment and donating 5% of their annual profits to charity. This year we were selected as one of the beneficiaries of their Loving Room Fund. The fund collects a percent of every commission to then donate to local nonprofits.

The profits from these t-shirts and mugs will further add to Living Room Realty’s charitable contribution.

Last fall, on a mission to investigate campsite removals, or “sweeps” around the country, reporters from ProPublica came to Rose Haven and interviewed our guests on the impact of sweeps on their day to day lives. They published a series of articles describing how sweeps create a cycle of hardship for our neighbors who are living unsheltered. These ProPublica articles demonstrate the harms of sweeps that Rose Haven staff and volunteers hear about everyday from our guests.

Sweeps often take survival items that keep our guests warm and dry, and increase the burden on organizations like Rose Haven that supply those items. There have also been reports of sweeps destroying irreplaceable sentimental items which for many people feed important parts of their identities, allow relief from life’s hardships, and help them connect with others. Additionally, sweeps make it incredibly difficult for people experiencing homelessness to work towards finding housing, employment, mental health, and other resources. 

To learn more about how sweeps impact people experiencing homelessness around the country check out the ProPublica articles linked below.

Swept Away: When Cities Take Belongings From Vulnerable Residents

In this article, ProPublica uplifts interviews on sweeps carried out across the country, several of which were with our guests. “Over and over, they told ProPublica that having possessions taken traumatizes them, exacerbates health issues and undermines efforts to find housing and get or keep a job.

 

“I Have Lost Everything”: The Toll of Cities Homeless Sweeps

This article shares examples of what people have lost from campsite removals including important documents, survival gear, and irreplaceable sentimental items. The article shares responses from interviewees who were given notecards to write about things that were lost during sweeps.

 

Cities Say They Store Property Taken From Homeless Encampments. People Rarely Get Their Things Back

Portland, Oregon, distributes cards to people whose belongings are stored after encampment removals. Stephenie, who is homeless, received a similar card after her belongings were taken. Credit: ProPublica, Photo provided by Portland officials

While many cities store items that were taken in sweeps, the process for what to save and what to discard is not standardized. Even when items are stored, there are barriers to retrieving them. “In Portland, which stores the most among the cities ProPublica reviewed, property was reclaimed 4% of the time during a recent 12-month period.”

 

U.S. Supreme Court Ruling Will Allow More Aggressive Homeless Encampment Removals

This article discusses the recent Grants Pass camping ban that went to the Supreme Court last summer. “The U.S. Supreme Court’s decision to give cities broader latitude to punish people for sleeping in public when they have no other options will likely result in municipalities taking more aggressive action to remove encampments, including throwing away more of homeless people’s property, advocates and legal experts said.”

 

Albuquerque Is Throwing Out the Belongings of Homeless People, Violating City Policy

One of two articles covering Albuquerque, New Mexico’s campsite removals: “The city has violated a court order and its own policies by discarding the personal property of thousands of homeless people, who have lost medications, birth certificates, IDs, treasured family photos and the ashes of loved ones.

 

Judge Lifts Order That Mandated Albuquerque Stop Throwing Away Homeless People’s Belongings

A second article on how Albuquerque, New Mexico is handling campsite removals: “A district judge stood by his previous finding that the city has seized and destroyed personal property during its homeless encampment removals but said a pending Supreme Court ruling could make his order ‘unworkable.’

 

What I Learned Reporting in Cities That Take Belongings From Homeless People

Here, a reporter from ProPublica shares her takeaways from reporting on campsite removals. “Our reporting shows there are more effective and compassionate ways for cities to deal with these issues.”

 

Want to Report on Homelessness? Here’s What Our Sources Taught Us About Engaging Responsibly

A team of ProPublica journalists reported in 11 cities to connect with people who experienced homeless encampment sweeps. News applications developer Ruth Talbot visited Rose Haven, a day shelter and community center in Portland, Oregon. Credit: Asia Fields/ProPublica

When ProPublica reporters visited Rose Haven to interview our guests, we shared advice on trauma informed interviewing strategies for those who have experienced homelessness. 

To navigate those and ensure our reporting was as responsible as possible, we turned to the experts: people who experienced homelessness, service providers and key community members… During interviews, many of our sources described sweeps as traumatic, and some mentioned other traumatic experiences they had been through.” 

 

Have You Experienced Homelessness? Do You Work With People Who Have? Connect With Our Reporters

Learn how to get in touch with reporters from ProPublica to share your story. 

femme fatale poster

Femme Fatale Fest is Looking for Sponsors!

Femme Fatale Fest is seeking sponsors to fund the festival! Femme Fatale Fest is a celebration of women/femmes in local alternative music. Women have and always will be such an important part of rock music and this festival celebrates that.

We’re so grateful to the folks at this festival for raising funds to donate to Rose Haven. In 2024 they raised $1,234 for the Rose Haven community. 

Check out the FFF Sponsor Packet

On Saturday, December 21st, we gathered together at Ground Score Association on the longest, darkest day of the year to pay tribute to the loved ones we have lost this year while or after experiencing homelessness. In Multnomah County alone, we lost at least 496 people in 2023—the highest number of deaths in this community since the county began publishing the annual “Domicile Unknown” reports. 

Every day, we continue to honor the friends, family, and neighbors we have lost, and we thank you for your ongoing support of the Rose Haven community. With your help, we can continue to provide vital services to over 4,000 people every year.

Watch the KOIN news story here

Read the Domicile Unknown report here